>>11685988I'm not about to pay for this, but if the subject is what
>>11686101 is saying, then ignore it. Physics is not changing, this research group has absolutely garbage and biased data analysis that has produced three "new particles" in the existence of the group. They haven't published a single paper that wasn't either a "discovery" of a new particle or a paper that said "lol it wasn't a new particle soz..."
t. searching for new physics at a real university
