>>11683208>LOL. LET'S BE REAL ACADEMIC MATHBOI, NO ONE __NEEDS__ TOPOLOGY FOR CSIn robotics, it's very important for motion and planning lol. Look up any standard book on the subject.
> ALMOST AS AUTISTIC AS CATEGORY THEORY. SURPRISED YOU DIDN'T MENTION CATEGORY THEORY EXPLECITYELY.I'd have mentioned category theory if he wanted to know about TCS or compilers, but it wasn't relevant to the conversation?
>YEAH, OP WILL BE ONE OF 4 PEOPLE ON PLANET EARTH RESEARCHING ABOUT THE COMPLEXITY OF PROBABILISTIC ALGORITHMS
...probabilistic algorithms is one of the most well funded subsets of algorithms research. Outside of very class, discrete graph and combinatorial research, it's one of the most popular among algorithms in popular clustering applications...
>SAME AS THE PREVIOUS ONES, ACADEMIX NONSENSE FOR CS.algebra is the basis of like half the theory arguments in CS lmao, where would you be without error correcting codes?
>CLASSIC /sci/ ACADEMIC MATHBOI, SOMEONE COMES ASKING FOR DA MATH >IN LESS THAN 1 HOUR U GET SOME ECCENTRIC MATHBOI WITH 0 TOUCH WITH REALITYI didn't recommend him anything other than "it depends on the subfields you're interested in." I mean...it's literally true. I'm making the assumption here that he wants CS since he mentioned crypto, not software engineering...and even then I said to just look at basics and read the applied book
>nonsense fields to masteryou don't 'master' these fields - you study them as easy background for the topics you want to get into..
>THE SHIT YOU ARE LISTING INVOLVES YEARS OF STUDYING JUST TO COVER THE BASICS.Not really? It really takes about a year's worth of focused study assuming you're past basic calculus and linear lol...which is about the level you'd be asking for cryptography recommendations.
>ALSO HOW THE FUCK ARORA - BARAK IS CONSIDERED BASIC.because it is? It's a very standard intro book for complexity? It's a survey of results that literally sophomore can read, by its very design
