>>11668619>Thinks a piece of paper can be 'racist'>"normal journal">Doesn't know about liberal bias in science>Google Noah CarlLynn published in normal journals, as did Rushton, but I bet you think they're racist too.
The paper I cited was literally from the journal Intelligence.
But you don't care about that. You just think there can't be a genetic basis for differences in IQ. You don't want to believe it. You cannot conceive divergent evolution occurred in humans can you.
What do you think journals actually do anyway? They are a poor proxy for research quality or strong methodology, its not like the people reading them spot mistakes particularly effectively?
