>>11666689a long line of null results, a proof does not make.
>>11666796Memory
>>11664049Because light is an electromagnetic phenomena and glass capacitizes the magnetic component of it. When you're moving the glass lenses, you're increasing the time it takes for the sensor to receive said light. That's also the reason for chromatic aberration. The blue end spectrum of light has more frequency and has to pass through more glass then the other spectrum of light, resulting in incoherency/seperation of light by the time it reaches the sensor.
Think of a lens as a lag switch for light. Your eyes are basically the same thing as a lens, even with your brain as a fast sensor you'll still get "motion blur".
>but muh speed of lightWell glass proves that shit wrong then I guess, not that it was ever right to begin with.
