>>11662725"I could argue with you but I'm too lazy and scared to acknowledge a term that's been bastardized".
It's okay, it doesn't have to be about God or Jesus you know.
>>11663468>You can't prove that souls exist, so they don't exist.This is an argument from ignorance and doesn't even warrant a response. You must also believe there isn't mice in your house because you can't see or hear them at this moment.
>>11662703Math quantifies what exists. It does not actually pertain to the events that take place in reality. The thing exists and then is measured. The non physical reality could only be memory itself, not something specific such as the act of thinking or logic. Memory is just the stability of knowledge, just a lost recalling of something that was to be known about. Memories of the previous iterations of whatever are imprinted on future iterations to grow upon as a foundation.
In a way, you are memories. DNA based on other DNA causes matter to condense and eventually form into an organism. This organism, this memory did not exist prior and will interlace/corrupt its own memories as it progresses. Like Plato's cave, we'll never be able to see or know "the sun" just as we'll never see the original "source" or uncorrupted memory.
>I personally believe we are much much larger than our physical bodies, and that even our physical bodies are part of our soul. It's just our physical body is the part of our soul that pokes into this simulated reality. Kinda like tip of the iceberg if you will.Sort of the opposite with me. That we're infinitesimally smaller than our physical bodies in the form of memory. That the loss and corruption of the idea/coherency/memory that makes you "you" is what makes "matter". That what you do, how you are, your personality, and the actions you want to do is not actually "physical" at all, it just requires that you be "physical" in order to do those things translated in this physical world of overlapped and corrupted memories.
