>>11660899>Look, innovation rate is in decline, we could offset the decline if we got rid of institutionalist beliefs like yours.
I'm sure you have a lot of great sources backing this argument up. Care to share them?
>You must know about publish or perish - well that attitude suppresses real innovation, because hard problems take a lot of time to solve, and that simply isn't funded in academia.So you're telling me publish or perish is the reason that you can't find a single example of someone who has made a contribution to a STEM field that's at all notable?
>And what can you do without access to a lab?Math, computer science, apparently astrophysics, the list goes on.
>and to get a lab of your own at a uni you need to put up with their bullshit for years.I was second author on a conference paper in my second year of undergrad. This bar really isn't as high as you think it is
>Its, as i said, anti-innovation.This sounds like a cope
