>>11664281I think you misunderstood, I explicitly said:
>deaths will become an absolute NON-ISSUEwhich is detrimental opposite of:
>it kills every single person it comes into contact withYou see anon, a high fatality rate would actually be really good, since that would mean it would be much easier to contain. The low fatality + long incubation are the reason why NCov19 turned into a pandemic while Ebola was easily contained a few years back, even though it broke out in areas with abymsal medical infrastrucutre.
>a vaccine can never be made because it mutates too fastAgain, a wrong assumption that has nothing to do with what I said. In fact, Corona viruses mutate very slowly, compared to, say, influenza.
>nobody can ever become immuneAgain the opposite, virtually everyone who contracts the virus (and survives) develops immunity to some degree. However, this immunity does not last long - in simplified terms, Person A spreads the virus to Person B, B to C, and by the time Person D comes in contact with A, he or she has run out of antibodies and becomes reinfected. Thus the virus cycles through the population indefinitely. Herd immunity does not occur. This is a big problem.
>It's essentially a human race death sentence. There's nothing we can do about it.Not at all, the virus only kills the frail and elderly. However, it also causes extensive organ damage (especially lungs and kidneys) in many mild and asymptomatic cases. The data is in, this is not disputed by any medical professionals. What this means is this: millions of people in the US and Europe will develop chronic health issues, especially fatigue, as a direct result of Corona. This will impact economies to a degree orders of magnitude greater than the death of a few 100k retired Boomers.
