>>11657534Descriptions cannot be wrong. They also don't mean anything.
Ex:
"The sky is blue"; a correct description, which holds no bearing on why it is blue or how it got to be that way.
"the speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers regardless of their relative motion or the motion of the light source";a correct description, which holds no bearing on why it is that was or how light even works.
Another issue is that descriptions can't even be wrong if what they're describing doesn't even exist, nor has been shown to exist. This is why ERT is "correct" when it describes the arbitrary notions of "Space", "Time", and a "vacuum".
