/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11655140

160KiB, 730x869, math_caltech.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 10 May 02:30:54 2020 No.11655140 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11655423 >>11655424 >>11655898 >>11655924 >>11657199 >>11657283

Why do we need proofs??? Why don't we just take all true statements as axioms???

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 May 2020 04:34:09 No.11655370 Report

Quoted By:

Bruv what course is that it looks ez. Im just wondering as im self taught.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 May 2020 04:58:18 No.11655423 Report

Quoted By:

>>11655140
because some true statements aren't solvable. We may need new mathematics to describe them.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 May 2020 04:58:57 No.11655424 Report

Quoted By:

>>11655140
Because we can't know if they're true without proofs, retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 May 2020 10:39:40 No.11655898 Report

Quoted By:

>>11655140
how do you know that a statement is true in the first place ?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 May 2020 10:53:11 No.11655924 Report

Quoted By:

>>11655140
first year analysis?
pretty ez bro, figured caltech would be ball busting right from the start

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 May 2020 19:21:15 No.11657199 Report

Quoted By:

>>11655140
>Why don't we just take all true statements as axioms?
That is what physicists and engineers do

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 10 May 2020 19:45:12 No.11657283 Report

Quoted By:

>>11655140
>Why don't we just take all true statements as axioms???
Truth is not recursive, and depends on your metatheory anyways.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First