/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11649624

171KiB, 778x640, D3F.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Fri 08 May 08:29:50 2020 No.11649624 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11649930 >>11649939 >>11649946 >>11651136

>genuinely believes he's smart
>is unable to crack the social codes and experiences great grief in his life due to it
lmao i can't even fathom being one of you maggots, it's so easy to win the social game when there is barely anyone who actually knows what he's doing and everyone around you is in some sort of automatic trance.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 11:44:20 No.11649930 Report

Quoted By:

>>11649624
Thank you for showing me what you and I have.
You dense retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 11:45:20 No.11649932 Report

Quoted By:

based and psychopilled

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 11:51:58 No.11649939 Report

Quoted By: >>11649959

>>11649624
Who would want to win the social game to begin with? It has no real challenge, no real long-term communal outcome when viewed from a historical perspective, and requires one to waste so much of one's own time to maintain or secure that unless puppeteering meat sacks into arbitrary narratives or beliefs is one's specific fetish there is really no value add or time saving in doing so.

But if you're just bored and/or need results for one's experiments or theorems then I can understand why. Winning it however is, I dunno, fucking dumb.

Like ya gotta become the one then you have to describe what being the one means to others or teach people to tell others for you and blah blah blah.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 11:55:04 No.11649946 Report

Quoted By:

>>11649624
based and machiavellipilled

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 12:00:07 No.11649959 Report

Quoted By: >>11650000 >>11650499

>>11649939
This. I don't enjoy studying the behavior of NPCs, why would I waste time on that instead of developing and training neural networks?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 12:15:54 No.11650000 Report

Quoted By: >>11650047

>>11649959
Why bother doing that when you can just make yourself a GAN NPC and simply brute-force results ad hoc? That's what I did anyway. So long as I maintain a core process of always providing time-saving solutions using an expressive CNF language it achieves what I believe anyone would want if they wanted some sort of God level whatever-lala.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 12:36:33 No.11650047 Report

Quoted By: >>11650222

>>11650000
GANs are good for image generation but I'm not really into that. I could try to implement it in my forthcoming music generation project, but for now CNNs, RNNs and autoencoders more than satisfy my needs and wants.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 14:03:24 No.11650222 Report

Quoted By:

>>11650047
GAN's are good for generating simulacrum's sufficient to supplant or sublimate a presented truth value for a given stimulus.

Who would bother using it for image generation? Generational Adversarial Network's are about generations of data series presenting results and rulesets that can pass some discriminator.

They work for language, mathematical theorems, pretty much any pattern recognition.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 15:51:36 No.11650499 Report

Quoted By:

>>11649959
>why would I waste time on that instead o
so you could convince them to do your grunt work for you, and network so your ideas won't die in obscurity

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 08 May 2020 19:30:07 No.11651136 Report

Quoted By:

>>11649624
>it's so easy to win the social game
How are you coping with your sociopathy diagnosis?

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches