>>11640100IQ increases 3 points per decade on average, so in about 60-70 years theoretically 120 will be the average.
The basic parts of society will still be here, government, the media, dumb people, smart people, nothing changes except the level of technology increases. As much as IQ is used effectively its not without its issues. Unlike what this anon said
>>11640693 IQ isn't necessarily bullshit, its just that the way it measures your intelligence is by gauging your general knowledge of the world, and how effectively you can solve problems having to do with the modern world.
If you took an IQ test from a hundred years ago assuming they were the same which they were not, then theoretically you'd probably score around 130, as opposed to getting a 100 today. So if you think of IQ as an understanding of the world you live in rather than a test of inherent ability, then you'll realize that it doesn't have that much of an effect on how people succeed in the world.
