>>11633703I honestly doubt, there's a single science without mathematics, but my vote goes for cognitive linguistics - yes it's related to mathematics, but it looks like only the conceptual foundations of mathematics which might make it easier for someone who's not strong numerically speaking but is still verbally competent to deal with the more abstract parts of mathematics that are required in things like category theory but removed enough from the technicalities that the theory addresses.
Also, almost no social science requires you to know maths to understand their research papers, you can just skim all the stats if you want (though I guess it can indeed give you a more subtle understanding of it), and a lot of the aspects of the biological sciences don't deal directly with processes but with an ontology of objects, so you can go for that which would be loaded more in the verbal capacity than the mathematical one, and even then it wouldn't be the aspect behind it's competitiveness.
