>>11650050>set a standard of measure for what you believe has no standard of measureThat's been done already, and will continue to be done countless times through history. And for what? To despise intuition?
>All conjecture no math.So you'd rather do math about conjectures? Cause that's what ERT/SR/QM basically is. Math of that which was never proven to exist.
>If you do math with a model and it matches reality this is a good modelMath has absolutely nothing to do with reality or what takes place in reality. What's measured is what already existed, not the other way around. It does not create, destroy, cause or uncause anything. It quantifies the "thing" being spoken of, which is a fancy way of saying that it describes it in a way that certain people understand. A language basically. It's like saying that you're only allowed to describe something in English or Spanish and that no other language is allowed to make up words for it.
>see he's retarded! Can't even into maths!Math is used for describing, copying/repetition, equating, limiting, comparing, and standardizing to name a few. Which is very useful when it comes to manipulating and altering the qualities of the real things that actually exist. However, it fails at explaining why or how those things exist in the first place.
>Do some math with your Retarded counter model and see if it matches experiment oh wait you can’t because your theory is just mindless conjecture and you can’t. Experiment? Oh you mean like a scientific experiment that tests things that empirically exist? Would you care to show me one of these experiments that tested "space" and/or "time"? Oh wait let me guess, I have to "know the math" right? I have to take the time to learn a language because sophisticates don't want to explain it in a way that can be understood by all? "It is" or "it isn't" something to be tested, a yes or no answer basically.
