>>11624581>>11625208Let's clear up some confusion.
There's the finite/individual/relative self, the self most people think they are. (you) with a lower case "y".
Then there's the infinite/collective/absolute self, the totality of existence. (You) with an upper case "Y".
Lower case (you) is a small part of upper case (You), and you can access (You) by recognizing everything in your experience as being part of You.
Modern science insists that (you) are your body, thoughts, and emotions and that's all. This is an insistence for which there is no proof. Where is the line? Why am I my body? Because I can feel, see, and move it? I can see my body, but I can also see many other things. I can feel my body, but I can also feel many other things. So where do we draw the line?
The answer is that while in the biggest sense, You are technically everything within your consciousness, we lack the awareness to experience this directly. The result is that we walk around life with a truncated/narrow perception of what we actually are, and because of that, we are in a constant process of figuring out who/what we are. What are we? The absolute answer is that (You) are everything. The relative/finite/individual answer is that (you) are whatever you decide you are.
The more of yourself you can accept that you are, the more access you will have to (You), which basically raises your power level. But just because you can accept certain parts of yourself and your experience doesn't mean you should do nothing to change them. For the individual (you), emotions carry information which we can use to inform how we should act. Many people don't let themselves feel those emotions, so they never learn how to let the emotions inform their actions. Ignore your emotions at your own peril, it might turn you into an edgy faggot. Speaking from experience.
