>>11619430The quotes of Richard Dawkins are perfectly consistent with what Heisenberg, Einstein, Schrodinger and Bohr are saying. I'm sure all four would agree with him.
With Krauss's qoute it's a bit more subtle but it's clear that he means the philosophy as an academic field that exists today, not philosophy as a whole. I'm also pretty sure all four would agree with Krauss if they lived in the same age and observe the reality of what philosophers of science are talking about. Again, Krauss is talking about the current state of the field, not the potential value of the field.
Bill Nye is obviously out of his league and doesn't k now what he's talking about, as usual. No surprises there. Also, he's not a scientist. He's a "science guy".
Degrasse Tyson also in the same league as Bill Nye. Impossible to defend those statements.
