Why dont more people talk about this? I'm not gonna get all "muh conscious quantum woo" bullshit but this clearly indicates that all our classical understandings of reality are completely wrong.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/9903047.pdf
There have been some attempts to salvage the situation (like the paper "Taming the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser" from Johannes Fankhauser or "Demystifying the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser" from Tabish Qureshi) but these are, to put it simply, just fucking cope and wrong, and do not salvage the situation.
Another paper, "Experimental test of local observer-independence", tells us that
>"In a state-of-the-art 6-photon experiment, we realize this extended Wigner’s friend scenario, experimentally violating the associated Bell-type in-equality by 5 standard deviations. If one holds fast to the assumptions of locality and free-choice,this result implies that quantum theory should be interpreted in an observer-dependent way".
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.05080.pdf
However, we already know that non-locality is falsified brainlet pseudoscience, and therefore that quantum mechanics is observer dependent. From the paper "An experimental test of non-local realism";
>"In the experiment, we measure previously untested correlations between two entangled photons, and show that these correlations violate an inequality proposed by Leggett for non-local realistic theories. Our result suggests that giving up the concept of locality is not sufficient to be consistent with quantum experiments, unless certain intuitive features of realism are abandoned"
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0704.2529.pdf
All of these results, and the results of all the other quantum experiments, are clearly telling us something about reality that most people just seem to refuse to accept.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/9903047.pdf
There have been some attempts to salvage the situation (like the paper "Taming the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser" from Johannes Fankhauser or "Demystifying the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser" from Tabish Qureshi) but these are, to put it simply, just fucking cope and wrong, and do not salvage the situation.
Another paper, "Experimental test of local observer-independence", tells us that
>"In a state-of-the-art 6-photon experiment, we realize this extended Wigner’s friend scenario, experimentally violating the associated Bell-type in-equality by 5 standard deviations. If one holds fast to the assumptions of locality and free-choice,this result implies that quantum theory should be interpreted in an observer-dependent way".
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.05080.pdf
However, we already know that non-locality is falsified brainlet pseudoscience, and therefore that quantum mechanics is observer dependent. From the paper "An experimental test of non-local realism";
>"In the experiment, we measure previously untested correlations between two entangled photons, and show that these correlations violate an inequality proposed by Leggett for non-local realistic theories. Our result suggests that giving up the concept of locality is not sufficient to be consistent with quantum experiments, unless certain intuitive features of realism are abandoned"
https://arxiv.org/pdf/0704.2529.pdf
All of these results, and the results of all the other quantum experiments, are clearly telling us something about reality that most people just seem to refuse to accept.
