>in our hospital, 380 out of 1,000 virus tests came back positive
>this means that 38% of California is infected
How would you explain to retard brainlets that you can’t just extrapolate numbers from a skewed, non-random sample onto the entire population?
>this means that 38% of California is infected
How would you explain to retard brainlets that you can’t just extrapolate numbers from a skewed, non-random sample onto the entire population?
