>>11611538>idkReality is not how you are saying it is. It is completely consistent with conscious somehow deriving from our biology.
The proper thing to do is admit you are wrong. You do not something, (that human beings are uniquely conscious), and that something contradicts what you have been advocating (that there is nothing innately biological about consciousness). So you are wrong.
>you're ignoring the potential benefits of letting that person breed as their child could be more beneficial than the diabetes they are delivering.There could be potential benefits. There is always potential. Theres always unknowns. But it makes no sense to say "Well, because there are unknowns, you must disregard the negaitves".
If I had to pick between two seemingly identical job opportunities, but one paid better, you would be insane to say "Well, I dont know which one is better, so I should disregard the low pay and treat both opportunities equal."
If there two medication, and one had a horrible side effect, you wouldnt be like "Well, the side effect is horrible, but I dont know which medication will really work for me, so I cant judge that horrible side effect against it".
