List of elementary, settled facts, Fundamental Physics edition:
> Nature is inherently continuous. Discrete theories or theories based on cellular automata-like or pixel-like concepts are blatant pseudoscience. Being Quantum is not the same as being discrete, so this is not in conflict with Quantum Mechanics at all, quite the opposite.
> Nature is inherently stochastic/probabilistic/random. Deterministic theories are demonstrably false. Probabilities is all that we can predict, and this is not just due to our lack of knowledge or precision, but it is fundamental.
> Nature is inherently local. No faster than light transfer of information or any other superluminal effects is possible.
> Nature is inherently non-realist. We cannot speak meaningfully of the definiteness of the results of measurements that have not been performed. An observer (not to be conflated with conscious beings) is a basic requirement in quantum mechanics.
> "Interpretations of quantum mechanics" are overwhelmingly pseudoscience. But as much as some of them can be said to be correct, it is Copenhagen or it's upgrade, Consistent (Decoherent) Histories.
> Energy may not be globally conserved in General Relativity and this is OK.
> We already have the correct theory of low energy quantum gravity, it is theory of high energy quantum gravity that is largely unknown. Consequently, low energy tabletop QG experiments are very likely a waste of time and funding.
> String Theory is very likely the correct general approach for the theory of high energy quantum gravity and also other forces, otherwise known as the Theory of Everything.
> Cosmic Inflation is very likely the actual mechanism behind The Big Bang.
Some of these statements may seem controversial to laymen or even some subpar physicists. They are not controversial among actually competent researchers at all.
Thank you for listening.
> Nature is inherently continuous. Discrete theories or theories based on cellular automata-like or pixel-like concepts are blatant pseudoscience. Being Quantum is not the same as being discrete, so this is not in conflict with Quantum Mechanics at all, quite the opposite.
> Nature is inherently stochastic/probabilistic/random. Deterministic theories are demonstrably false. Probabilities is all that we can predict, and this is not just due to our lack of knowledge or precision, but it is fundamental.
> Nature is inherently local. No faster than light transfer of information or any other superluminal effects is possible.
> Nature is inherently non-realist. We cannot speak meaningfully of the definiteness of the results of measurements that have not been performed. An observer (not to be conflated with conscious beings) is a basic requirement in quantum mechanics.
> "Interpretations of quantum mechanics" are overwhelmingly pseudoscience. But as much as some of them can be said to be correct, it is Copenhagen or it's upgrade, Consistent (Decoherent) Histories.
> Energy may not be globally conserved in General Relativity and this is OK.
> We already have the correct theory of low energy quantum gravity, it is theory of high energy quantum gravity that is largely unknown. Consequently, low energy tabletop QG experiments are very likely a waste of time and funding.
> String Theory is very likely the correct general approach for the theory of high energy quantum gravity and also other forces, otherwise known as the Theory of Everything.
> Cosmic Inflation is very likely the actual mechanism behind The Big Bang.
Some of these statements may seem controversial to laymen or even some subpar physicists. They are not controversial among actually competent researchers at all.
Thank you for listening.
