>>11602496It's a semantic argument because you're trying to conflate revolutionary (as in original) with revolutionary (a political struggle). Please, keep up, you fucking idiot.
Anyway, now that I have cleared that up, let's analyze your trite post, because I really want to nail home a couple of points.
>Yes in world of lies telling the truth is a revolutionary act.Okay, so first, your assumption is that the world is majority lies. What proof do you have of this?
Your second is assumption is that you are telling the truth. What proof do you have of this?
>So you want to actively run from the truth because you might "lose friends" over it?Again, see above. Where is the proof of this so-called truth?
And the rest of your post, to reiterate, it just filler in the form of buzzwords and insults.
Come on, hurry up and own me.
