/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11583675

99KiB, 620x631, clock fucking.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 05:19:13 2020 No.11583675 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11583700 >>11583796 >>11583948 >>11587195

>make rod of neutronium (no atoms, just solid packed neutrons, densest material possible)
>rod should have a diameter about the size of the moon, a length measured in light years
>spin rod so surface is moving near the speed of light
>fly a space ship at it just right
>universe "confuses" a spatial dimension with temporal dimension
>space ship trajectory moves through time and two spatial dimension instead of three spatial dimensions
>kill own grand-father
>sex your young grandma
>profit

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 05:34:31 No.11583700 Report

Quoted By: >>11585612

>>11583675
If that worked someone would have come back by now

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 06:30:17 No.11583796 Report

Quoted By: >>11583806 >>11583810 >>11584209

>>11583675
that much neutronium would collapse into a black hole

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 06:36:05 No.11583806 Report

Quoted By:

>>11583796
Now I want to know how much neutronium you'd need to made a black hole.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 06:37:56 No.11583810 Report

Quoted By: >>11583823

>>11583796
but this is a rod of neutronium, not a ball

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 06:43:02 No.11583823 Report

Quoted By: >>11583829

>>11583810
Gravity will be so strong, you can't structurally make it stay a rod.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 06:44:55 No.11583829 Report

Quoted By: >>11583860 >>11583955

>>11583823
I don't suppose you've got any actual proof?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 06:56:12 No.11583860 Report

Quoted By:

>>11583829
he believes in black holes he has no proof

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 07:39:52 No.11583948 Report

Quoted By:

>>11583675
How do you know you'll go backwards?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 07:43:51 No.11583955 Report

Quoted By: >>11583964 >>11583965

>>11583829
What do you mean, proof? You know the density of neutron stars, or neutronium if you will. There's no process that can weld such a material, which is why all neutron stars are globes. Spinning so heavily, they could be rods, but aren't. So there's your proof.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 07:48:35 No.11583964 Report

Quoted By: >>11584004 >>11584097

>>11583955
You could use really strong gravity to make it a rod though?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 07:49:11 No.11583965 Report

Quoted By: >>11584097

>>11583955
gravitons nigga, it's possible in principle

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 08:28:55 No.11584004 Report

Quoted By:

>>11583964
Sorry what? I think you mean you can use really strong rotation to withstand the gravity to make it a rod though. And yes, you could do that in theory.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 09:33:29 No.11584097 Report

Quoted By: >>11586525

>>11583964
>>11583965
Why do you think every sufficiently large object in our universe is a ball?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 11:18:08 No.11584209 Report

Quoted By: >>11584271

>>11583796
This is the only non-idiot in this thread

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 11:47:54 No.11584271 Report

Quoted By: >>11585359 >>11585589

>>11584209
>Neutron stars the size of the moon don't exist

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 19:20:17 No.11585359 Report

Quoted By: >>11585557

>>11584271
You forgot the length measured in light years. That is a measure of length, not a period for diet.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 20:32:52 No.11585557 Report

Quoted By:

>>11585359
>neutron stars the size of the moon don't exist
>fractional measure of the light year metric don't exist
you dumb motherfucker

75904wSS

75904wSS Mon 20 Apr 2020 20:34:31 No.11585562 Report

Quoted By: >>11585597

!!tifYLpj6uiQ

!!tifYLpj6uiQ Mon 20 Apr 2020 20:37:02 No.11585568 Report

Quoted By: >>11585597

!!28vGO1v1C/L

!!28vGO1v1C/L Mon 20 Apr 2020 20:38:04 No.11585572 Report

Quoted By: >>11585597

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 20:44:06 No.11585589 Report

Quoted By: >>11585597

>>11584271
They would collapse into a black hole long before being that big

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 20:46:35 No.11585597 Report

Quoted By: >>11586598

>>11585589
You're pathologically wrong here. Check the math bro, if you can.
>>11585562
>>11585566
>>11585568
>>11585572
what are you doing? some kind of aspie morse code?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 20 Apr 2020 20:52:53 No.11585612 Report

Quoted By:

>>11583700
Turns out our universe is ruled by a race of sentient spacetime defects that exist in a time loop spanning the entire history of the universe. They're locked on a perpetual war with a race of dark matter space birdmen.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Apr 2020 02:02:06 No.11586525 Report

Quoted By: >>11587082 >>11587092

>>11584097
Because balls are spherically symmetrical. Gravity is spherically symmetrical. Non-spherical objects are resisting gravity.
Add enough weight to something, and suddenly, nothing can resist gravity.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Apr 2020 02:27:32 No.11586598 Report

Quoted By: >>11586705

>>11585597
Idk the math because they get more dense the more massive they are. But the limit is like 3 solar masses which a moon sized one would be much bigger then, if it didnt collapse

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Apr 2020 02:51:32 No.11586705 Report

Quoted By:

>>11586598
That's if it's a fucking sphere. In principle a rod can be formed and kept stable.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Apr 2020 05:52:36 No.11587082 Report

Quoted By: >>11587092

>>11586525
Exactly. Congratulations, you're among the three or so only non-retards in here.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Apr 2020 05:58:27 No.11587092 Report

Quoted By: >>11587126

>>11586525
>>11587082
You are both inbred retarded fucking faggots who should just kill yourselves. It is in principle possible to use gravitons to shape the star into a rod with the diameter of the moon. Suck my dick.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Apr 2020 06:12:58 No.11587126 Report

Quoted By:

>>11587092
No, I'm afraid your stupidity will transfer.
Get some education, troll.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 21 Apr 2020 07:01:24 No.11587195 Report

Quoted By:

>>11583675
> densest material possible
No that's you OP

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches