>>11581950As retarded as OP seems, there is 1 logical error in the incorrect assumption OP cites, tho OP fails to mention what that is so I'll elucidate
assuming that life is a spontaneously thing that occurs on planets with some degree of probability
>the larger the universe is, the greater the probability one or more planets in the universe has life like oursthis is OP's argument, or counter argument? OP isn't clear but is clearly deranged (seek help OP)
the fallacy starts with this:
>the larger the universe is, the more difficult it'll be to find another planet where life has occurredSo a larger universe makes it more probable life will exist somewhere but also more probable we'll never find life, due to it's size.
This makes the claim unfalsifiable, and grows even more unfalsifiable the larger the universe becomes.
It's like trying to find a needle in an ever growing hay stack. Even if more needles magically appear in the haystack as it grows larger, it doesn't increase our probability of finding one. It grows ever more impossible to prove, and ever more unfalsifiable.
