>>11584408>If there's a way to turn brain signals into computer signals, then there's also the reverse.That is not a bad assumption. And this is something that exists now and been in use for a long time.
I've personally haven't worked with FFT's too much.
What I'm trying to say is that a word can form a pattern of frequencies, which can get matched against a library of words and in turn represent actual word. Which can be turned around into a discrete domain easily, which is essentially turning it into a computer signal.
So imagine that you could create a library of patterns of words themselves, to represent sentences. So now you have, I assume, what we call the """""modern ai"""" found in botnet devices. I mean the thing is simple and OLD, there's nothing new here, I'm surprised they have made this little advance in the field so far. They also call it automatic transcription, but of course they'll be using the marketing buzzwords, like "natural language AI" and other bs.
What makes you think reading brain signals is something that special? The hardware that's available for that is expensive and bulky right now, but you can do it. When it'll become cheap and miniaturised into a cap you put on your head, then there'll an abundance of shovelware that comes with it, most likely from google, facebook and alike cancer.
Telepathy exists and is nothing new, it's called radio emitters/receivers or mobile phones nowadays, also internet.
People should wake up and realise that "magic" is very real. You can fly, speak with other people over distances, ride horses that never tire, kill people through distance with a press of a button, create any kind of thing you can imagine and much much more. The only thing limiting us is either knowledge and understanding of things or lack of imagination. There's nothing impossible, rather, it's harder to imagine things that could be. Considering that people from 2000 years ago dreamt and fantasised about things that are common nowadays
