>>11576553First, your image choice was a poor example of visual communication, since the red CORONAVIRUS visual element is in the foreground and predominates, so that it would be reasonable for a casual browser infer that this is what you meant. When you choose a visual element for your OP, you need to make it absolutely clear what your intent is in both picture and text. You may not like that, but that's how you avoid dumb replies and thread derailment. the OP image choice is also very often a subconscious choice which undermines or thwarts what the OP was trying to get across in text.
Second, as (something-something)chloroquine has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment which continues to be discussed (your thread as one example), it isn't "snake oil". This leads me to suppose that your thread is a bad faith political observation as opposed to an invitation to scientific discussion.
Third, the happiest effect of all this is that it's shut down discussion of the real unscientific snake oil: global warming, though the same apparatuses of capture are now more explicitly being sought after in light of present circumstances.
