/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11566813

412KiB, 2048x1538, DuV6IpCUwAIIrjA.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 09:49:14 2020 No.11566813 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11566824 >>11566845 >>11566910 >>11567187 >>11567202 >>11567634

What the fuck is his problem?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZK5r9OZ73Xg
Seems to me he perfectly represents the Dunning-Kruger of /sci/

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO a72ekg1767d31.jpg, 37KiB, 590x295

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 09:55:03 No.11566824 Report

Quoted By: >>11566841

>>11566813
Haven't you noticed the steady march of con-men, self-promoters, and propped-up e-celebrities of the youtube age? They've always been around, but their style has changed. In the 60s they'd try to get on Johnny Carson by claiming they could bend spoons. Now they get on CNN and the Literally Who Podcast by claiming special inside knowledge of how not to be an incel.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 10:07:02 No.11566841 Report

Quoted By: >>11566860

>>11566824
Is there anyway to stop it?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 10:08:55 No.11566845 Report

Quoted By:

>>11566813
that whole 3 hour video wasn't bad

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 10:22:10 No.11566860 Report

Quoted By:

>>11566841
Education. Pop scientists and pseudointellectuals capitalize on the public's ignorance. The more accurate, actionable knowledge people have, the less they look to intellectual ghettos for insight.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 10:22:26 No.11566861 Report

Quoted By: >>11566918

Eric solved physics... his Geometric Unity is the Theory of Everything. We live in exciting times... Imagine you will live to see the Theory of Everything being unveiled. As Eric says: the universe will wake up as it comes to know its own source code.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 10:52:43 No.11566910 Report

Quoted By:

>>11566813
I know it’s fallacious reasoning but I can’t take this guy seriously because all the people who praise him are so fucking stupid.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 10:59:05 No.11566918 Report

Quoted By: >>11566923 >>11567008

>>11566861

Eric's big insight was to add angles to the geometric spacetime grid because he thinks that cubic spacetime cannot generate rounded surfaces. He is utterly, and provably wrong. He also thinks that matter is generated by a consciousness realm called the obseverse. His theory is as moronic as psychic crystals.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 11:06:46 No.11566923 Report

Quoted By: >>11566926

>>11566918
Prove him wrong, then. It’s you against every last reply in that video’s comment section.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 11:09:53 No.11566926 Report

Quoted By: >>11566929

>>11566923

https://youtu.be/6ClC50BsK5Y

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 11:12:27 No.11566929 Report

Quoted By: >>11566946 >>11566952 >>11567005

>>11566926
This doesn’t look peer-reviewed desu

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 11:24:33 No.11566946 Report

Quoted By: >>11566952 >>11566953

>>11566929

Are you saying you are too stupid to understand something is true when you see it? Do you need some authority to tell you that 1 + 1 = 2 also, or are you at least capable of understanding that on your own?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 11:28:18 No.11566952 Report

Quoted By:

>>11566929
>>11566946

And fyi, I'm being facetious. Take the fucking blinders off. Think for yourself. And yes, it was peer review, but again, that hardly matters. It's blatantly and obviously true. I don't need an authority to tell me that 1+1 = 2, or that evolution is real because this things are intuitively logical, and it is the same with the nature of reality.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 11:28:37 No.11566953 Report

Quoted By: >>11566958 >>11567671

>>11566946
How would I have ever learned that 1 + 1 = 2 if someone in a position of authority hadn’t told me that was the case?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 11:31:24 No.11566958 Report

Quoted By: >>11566970

>>11566953

Words are semantic. Think deeper than words. You intuitively would grock that one apple and one apple are two apples regardless of whatever language is used to convey that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 11:39:51 No.11566970 Report

Quoted By:

>>11566958
>It’s true because you know it’s true
Sorry bro but there’s more to math than that.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 12:02:06 No.11567005 Report

Quoted By:

>>11566929
> peer-reviewed desu
It's pajeet-reviewed.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 12:02:48 No.11567008 Report

Quoted By: >>11567190

>>11566918
You think you're smarter than Eric?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 13:45:19 No.11567187 Report

Quoted By: >>11567191

>>11566813
I hate gags that go on and be ‘science’ fags and just talk about useless shit as though it’s profound.

WHAT IF WE HAD THOUSANDS IF ELONS!?

Stopped watching there

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 13:48:15 No.11567190 Report

Quoted By:

>>11567008
I think if I spent 5 years getting a PhD in cosmology or physics I would be smarter than him.

There are so few people going into physics right now any dumb Jew can get a doctorate and make mkney talking about atheism if they so much as write 40 pages about nearly anything.

Modern physics is worse than scholastics arguing about angels on a pin. No talent

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 13:49:10 No.11567191 Report

Quoted By: >>11567199

>>11567187
I think you missed his point dude

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 13:51:44 No.11567199 Report

Quoted By:

>>11567191
I got his point but I don’t care. We’re not going to build a nerdocracy where al the smart Jews get to be billionaires and rule over the goyim and chads.
He’s a fucking retard for even pretending that idea is somehow intelligent or anything other than fantasy. Yet he really does.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 13:52:32 No.11567202 Report

Quoted By: >>11567215 >>11567630

>>11566813
I am a hobbyist physicist, so correct me if I'm wrong. But it seems like 90% of his lecture is just reviewing existing concepts in physics, but doing so in an extremely jargon heavy and hand wavey way.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 13:56:05 No.11567215 Report

Quoted By:

>>11567202

Correctamundo.

Weinstein's big "breakthrough" was in thinking that curved space cannot come from a cubic spacetime grid, so he added diagonal dimentions in addition to x y z. He is legit a fucking retard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 16:35:21 No.11567630 Report

Quoted By:

>>11567202
>he just discovered what meme scientists do

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 16:37:20 No.11567634 Report

Quoted By:

>>11566813
Scientifically speaking, why does he have so many warts on his face?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO subitizing.jpg, 1MiB, 1370x2558

Anonymous Wed 15 Apr 2020 16:49:43 No.11567671 Report

Quoted By:

>>11566953
You don't even need to — that's why it's cited as an example of something blindingly obvious, even if you have no abstract concept of a number. Distinguishing between one, two, three or none of a given object is an innate ability in humans and most mammals, called "subitizing", and it exists for survival purposes.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches