>>11568082>Why are you bringing this up again and again then, when I never claimed such a thing?I said that I believe that space and time are discrete. You then got triggered and said that there is no room for belief in science.
>Last week I said we KNOW that theories are correct in their respective domain, but incomplete. There is no room to say we "believe" in them.No, we don't. If we did know them to be correct, they wouldn't be theories. They would be something else, axioms perhaps.
We do not know whether space and time are discrete or continuous (which is how this whole argument got started). Feel free to correct me if you are some omniscient magic wizard with proof of the continuity or discreteness of space and/or time.
>That would make science religionSo are you saying that people who believe the Copenhagen interpretation, or the MWI, etc, are religious? Since they believe in some scientific concept?
