>>11564027You're free when you're not under external coercion and are able to conceive different alternatives from which you can choose according to your values. You're choice is not free when it's some automatic reflex not under your conscious control. These distinctions that actually matter don't need indeterminism to explain them. How could things happening for no reason at all account for human freedom, responsibility and self-control?
>You don't really have a choice since all your decisions are being influenced by the molecular state of the brainyou're talking as if the molecular state of your brain was some totally separate different from yourself. If it's not separate from you, then how does that imply that it wasn't you who made the choice? Willusionists pretend to be redpilled and hardcore reductionists but they keep bringing these dualist assumptions to prove their point. Half-assed reductionism leads to denial of free will, proper reductionism to compatibilism.
