/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11558879

28KiB, 887x516, twinprime.png

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 21:51:31 2020 No.11558879 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11558881 >>11558885 >>11558888 >>11559051 >>11559096 >>11559178 >>11559184 >>11561836

>i am literally one press of a button away from resolving the twin prime conjecture

what are your bets?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 21:52:49 No.11558881 Report

Quoted By: >>11558893

>>11558879
>isPrime
>if (n % i == 0) return true

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 21:53:29 No.11558885 Report

Quoted By: >>11559000

>>11558879
/biz/ here just buy chainlink retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 21:54:34 No.11558888 Report

Quoted By: >>11559000 >>11559044

>>11558879
>BigInteger

I haven't used that since when I tried to solve a Project Euler question through trivial brute force when I was 12. After the fourth hour of runtime, I realized it was the wrong approach.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO twinprime2.0.png, 28KiB, 874x511

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 21:56:12 No.11558893 Report

Quoted By: >>11560718 >>11561268

>>11558881
whopsie a bug slipped into 1.0
2.0 is flawless though.

where do i collect my field medal after i press f5?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 21:59:33 No.11558901 Report

Quoted By:

>C#
Based retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 22:13:15 No.11558919 Report

Quoted By: >>11558923

Does c# have support for infinity?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 22:15:15 No.11558923 Report

Quoted By: >>11558926

>>11558919
yes but only on quantum cpus

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 22:16:30 No.11558926 Report

Quoted By:

>>11558923
don't use a quantum computer it'll destroy the universe

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO calculating.png, 14KiB, 1123x650

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 22:30:30 No.11558966 Report

Quoted By: >>11558987 >>11558993

oh boy, the tension

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 22:40:45 No.11558987 Report

Quoted By: >>11559000

>>11558966
17% of infinity is quite large already. What an efficient algorithm. Maybe you'll solve P=NP in the process.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 22:43:40 No.11558993 Report

Quoted By:

>>11558966
Please post the result

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1586660743009.jpg, 65KiB, 720x720

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 22:45:59 No.11558997 Report

Quoted By:

Bruh just hook yourself up to a lie detector and say "the twin prime conjecture is true".

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 22:46:19 No.11559000 Report

Quoted By:

>>11558885
based

>>11558888
checked

>>11558987
comedy gold

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 209.png, 10KiB, 1112x622

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 22:57:54 No.11559031 Report

Quoted By: >>11559035

seems to be stuck? not sure if at 20.999... or 21 percent

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 22:59:26 No.11559035 Report

Quoted By: >>11559037 >>11559191 >>11561893 >>11561950 >>11562323

>>11559031
20.999... is equal to 21 percent.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:00:39 No.11559037 Report

Quoted By:

>>11559035
Oh god here we go again

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:03:56 No.11559044 Report

Quoted By:

>>11558888
lol are you me?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:08:50 No.11559051 Report

Quoted By: >>11559111

>>11558879
What language is that?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO twinprime3.png, 20KiB, 1599x704

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:11:20 No.11559061 Report

Quoted By: >>11559066

IT IS IN LADS

we're 7 primes short.
the conjecture has fallen.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:12:29 No.11559066 Report

Quoted By: >>11559085 >>11559126

>>11559061
Actually, infinity minus 7 is infinity, the conjecture is true.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:14:33 No.11559076 Report

Quoted By:

>When you find out you only have to check a finite amount of numbers to prove the twin-prime conjecture false

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:16:59 No.11559085 Report

Quoted By: >>11559105 >>11559117

>>11559066
lim(x->inf) x > lim(x->inf) x-7

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:18:40 No.11559096 Report

Quoted By: >>11559114

>>11558879
you're doing it wrong, it should be
[code:lit]
.Func<BigInteger, bool> isPrime = n => {
. for (int i = 2; i < n; i++)
. if (n % i != 0) return false;
. return true;
.}
[/code:lit]
otherwise you're saying it is prime if at least it is divisible by one integer in {2, ..., n}

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:21:21 No.11559105 Report

Quoted By: >>11559122

>>11559085
This is a false statement. Both limits are equal to infinity.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:23:28 No.11559111 Report

Quoted By:

>>11559051
Scala?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:24:30 No.11559114 Report

Quoted By:

>>11559096
sorry it is if (n % i == 0) return false;
i. e. n is divisible by i which means it isn't prime

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:25:23 No.11559117 Report

Quoted By:

>>11559085
lim*sin(x<inf)+sin(lin)inffunc</code = return;
try that

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:28:21 No.11559122 Report

Quoted By: >>11559137

>>11559105
sorry, i meant lim(x->inf) x + 7 > x

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO infintiies.png, 75KiB, 1166x738

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:30:19 No.11559126 Report

Quoted By: >>11559164

>>11559066

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:33:27 No.11559137 Report

Quoted By:

>>11559122
this isn't division here, the importance of the constant isn't diminished by the increasing size of the x

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:40:39 No.11559164 Report

Quoted By: >>11562017

Regardless of what >>11559126 picture says,
this infinity is indeed equal since the speed of convergence from both limits is the same. This is left for the reader as an exercise (Hint: use l'höpital's rule).

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:44:59 No.11559178 Report

Quoted By:

>>11558879
I'd bet if i knew that infinity was a magnitude and not an increasing number of available positions as numbers are being defined in a system.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:46:30 No.11559184 Report

Quoted By:

>>11558879
>i am literally one press of a button away from resolving the twin prime conjecture
If you were about to solve it, your announcement would not need to be this tabloidy and clickbaity.

see, I used soft science (language, psychology, culture) to formulate my assumption of your wrongness, you are not worthy of actual scientific disproving.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:49:07 No.11559191 Report

Quoted By: >>11559198 >>11559204

>>11559035
Non it's not :^)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:51:15 No.11559198 Report

Quoted By: >>11559417

>>11559191
Yes it is ;^)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 12 Apr 2020 23:53:51 No.11559204 Report

Quoted By: >>11559417

>>11559191
20.999... = 20 + 0.999...
= 20 + 1.0 (Since 0.999... = 1.0)
= 21.0

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 13 Apr 2020 01:22:28 No.11559417 Report

Quoted By:

>>11559204
>>11559198
20.9999... = 21 = 2100% != 21%.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO twinprimenoinf.png, 49KiB, 1174x627

Anonymous Mon 13 Apr 2020 13:52:20 No.11560711 Report

Quoted By: >>11562355

okay, due to controversy about the results in the thread, i have redesigned the algorithm to avoid dealing with infinity.
y'all better accept the answer i'm getting now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 13 Apr 2020 13:55:36 No.11560718 Report

Quoted By: >>11560721 >>11560727

>>11558893
Your isPrime is false, so is your numberOfTwinPrimes.
You have to do EVERYTHING in infinite precision integers.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 13 Apr 2020 13:56:41 No.11560721 Report

Quoted By:

>>11560718
ye obviously i corrected that typo before actually running it, just didn't bother posting the pic

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 13 Apr 2020 13:57:59 No.11560727 Report

Quoted By: >>11560733

>>11560718
ye obviously i corrected that typo before actually running it, just didn't bother posting the code

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 13 Apr 2020 14:00:13 No.11560733 Report

Quoted By:

>>11560727
Oh good. Post results after you have checked all the natural numbers.

Your next project could be Rieman's hypothesis, right? You just have to check all numbers in the critical strip and calculate whether they are zeros or not, right?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 3c8e7e09ff0251a8a9bdfb2b23c2c8e9.jpg, 14KiB, 370x320

Anonymous Mon 13 Apr 2020 14:05:20 No.11560745 Report

Quoted By:

Funny thread

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 13 Apr 2020 17:42:40 No.11561268 Report

Quoted By: >>11561273

>>11558893
Aside from the fact that this entire thread is a low quality shitpost, you can't even write the code for the shitpost properly. You're fucking clueless and it's really sad, LMAO

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 13 Apr 2020 17:44:40 No.11561273 Report

Quoted By:

>>11561268
Seethe harder codemonkey.
OP's thread is very funny.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 13 Apr 2020 21:02:27 No.11561836 Report

Quoted By:

>>11558879
They happen at generation of primes in certain way and they are simetric in differential analysis atleast a little bit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 13 Apr 2020 21:16:16 No.11561893 Report

Quoted By: >>11562064

>>11559035
Literally sudoku yourself you absolute fucktard

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 13 Apr 2020 21:33:32 No.11561950 Report

Quoted By:

>>11559035
Why doesn't it say 21 then?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 13 Apr 2020 22:03:36 No.11562017 Report

Quoted By:

>>11559164
Or prove that there exists a bijective function between (the set of natural numbers) and (the same set with 7 elements removed).
Which is trivially easy.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 13 Apr 2020 22:15:06 No.11562064 Report

Quoted By:

>>11561893
gaise I have this question, what could be a relative fucktard gaise

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 13 Apr 2020 23:53:48 No.11562323 Report

Quoted By:

>>11559035
Kek

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Apr 2020 00:05:52 No.11562355 Report

Quoted By: >>11562395

>>11560711
Holy shit, you solved the halting problem?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 14 Apr 2020 00:31:34 No.11562395 Report

Quoted By:

>>11562355
I suppose Intel did.

A weird glitch of the Matrix we have all slipped into here.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches