>>11558555That's silly. Humans can obviously invent things, like stories. You can construct any number of different sentences, and none of the them could be said to have "already existed in nature".
These stories/sentences can (and often are) arbitrarily constrained. People generally expect stories to be consistent, so if you began a book by describing a man as blonde, you can't switch to describing him as brunette mid-story with no reason. I mean, you CAN, the same way to CAN write "2+2=5", but it would be in some way wrong, because it breaks the pre-established plot.
It's very well possible math is simply a series of stories, constrained by the axioms and rules of logic we have established for ourselves as some sort of elaborate game.
