Scientifically speaking.

What is mathematical probability of accept order to help to somebody who does tortures you and is giving you just punishments?

Is more probable cooperation, that is punishment itself, or just ignorance that is also punished?

I'm interested in results from Q learning or some animal studies.

Can you train a dog if you just hold it on chain and beating him with a stick to obey your command or does biscuits works better?

Can blockage of dopamine receptor and serotonin receptor renders training and maze run not being learned but just done over and over again with no learning?

Can we test neuroleptic given and control and meth in water before maze run and some mushrooms too and SSRI long term, on maze resolution the rats can we test?

Like how fast maze is learned if having some patternal displacement of reward and swimming to reward passages that are equal to all sorts of rats, which rats remembers maze run faster?

Actually, does dog on neuroleptics looks playfull?

Please.

I actually wonder if psychiatry is just modern way of torturing people. According to science, it should just shut down your reward center and then you look confused, trying to resolve lower maslow necessities because with distractions like chemical blockage on receptor even that gets absolutely harder.

It just feels like sudo rm -r *f on every behaviour you do out of some expected reward and there's something like inability to fullfil goals or even start doing something, because its just not there in patients fucking head, anything that would push them forward for some expectation, actually they are just wiped out any ways to be better, because being better just don't works in brain.

Obeying to commands out of rationality to one who is injecting you pain and telling it will help you and free will doesn't sounds like viable plan...