>>11558489How many years, websites, and topics does this compilation span? You’re talking about a few articles per topic out of literally millions that have been written in that time span.
It’s scary that anyone is dumb enough to be manipulated by compilations. Someone puts a bunch of shit into a .jpg and it looks like “a lot” so you get fooled into thinking it’s common.
There’s nothing more reprehensible than stupidity.
