/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #11549213

79KiB, 640x640, 1562115399952.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Thu 09 Apr 21:48:31 2020 No.11549213 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>11549216 >>11549914 >>11549997 >>11550383

>planck length
Just divide it by two lmao

btfo

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 09 Apr 2020 21:49:01 No.11549216 Report

Quoted By: >>11549834

>>11549213
leave it to a frogposter to be a fucking retard

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 01:21:29 No.11549834 Report

Quoted By: >>11549838

>>11549216
explain how hes wrong?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 01:22:10 No.11549838 Report

Quoted By: >>11549911

>>11549834
>hes
wtf, don't assume anonymouss's gender

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 01:49:04 No.11549911 Report

Quoted By:

>>11549838
Traps are still he

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 01:50:41 No.11549914 Report

Quoted By: >>11549980 >>11549982 >>11550051 >>11550128

>>11549213
It's not how it works, when you get to those small distances, dividing just gives the same value. If you divide the planck length by two, you still get the planck length.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 02:23:20 No.11549980 Report

Quoted By: >>11549985

>>11549914
is that because it's the same length or because the new length(s) are the new smallest and whatever the smallest length is is by default a planck length?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 02:24:25 No.11549982 Report

Quoted By:

>>11549914
>dividing just gives the same value
explain pl0x, does that mean a planck length can't be divided or what are you saying?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 02:24:51 No.11549985 Report

Quoted By: >>11549988 >>11550051 >>11550304

>>11549980
It's because it's the same length. If you multiply infinity by anything, you still get infinity, so if you divide planck length by anything, you still get planck length.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 02:25:52 No.11549988 Report

Quoted By:

>>11549985
ic

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 02:31:35 No.11549997 Report

Quoted By:

>>11549213
this
we're talking about numbers, any number can be divided

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 03:04:47 No.11550051 Report

Quoted By: >>11550087

>>11549914
>>11549985
This is your mind on popsci

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 03:19:53 No.11550087 Report

Quoted By: >>11550113

>>11550051
why not explain why they're wrong and be an actual chad instead of a passive aggressive little faggot cunt?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 03:28:19 No.11550113 Report

Quoted By: >>11550123

>>11550087
x = x/2

2x = x

x = 0

So the planck length is 0? Faggot

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 03:35:04 No.11550123 Report

Quoted By: >>11550129

>>11550113
ok i was hoping for a verbal explanation i'm fucking math stupid

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO unit circle.png, 95KiB, 616x545

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 03:37:40 No.11550128 Report

Quoted By:

>>11549914
>Have plank
>Saw it in half

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 03:37:56 No.11550129 Report

Quoted By: >>11550135

>>11550123
ik

It's ok to be dumb, anon

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 03:41:50 No.11550135 Report

Quoted By:

>>11550129
don't judge a monkey on it's ability to do math nigger i've been waiting for you stupid math cunts to unveil the secrets of the universe with your stupid faggot numbers my whole god damn miserable life and you stupid cunts have come up with fuck all, LITERALLY FUCK ALL. MAYBE IT'S THIS MAYBE IT'S THAT LOL WE DONT KNOW FUCK YOU

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 04:26:35 No.11550204 Report

Quoted By:

>if you divide a centimeter by 2, it's still a centimeter.
Is this the new 0.999... thread? Same level of retarded.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 05:05:44 No.11550261 Report

Quoted By: >>11550368 >>11550996

I just spent like 30 seconds on Wikipedia and from what I got out of the 7-8 sentences I read is that the Planck length is just the length at which physical phenomena would require a theory of quantum gravity to understand and it has actually nothing to do with "the smallest distance there can ever be". I conclude that everyone who replies to this thread after my post is a blithering idiot without the brain capacity necessary to read 7-8 sentences.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 05:37:40 No.11550304 Report

Quoted By:

>>11549985
If it is of either length or breadth it is divisible necessarily. If it is a point it is not capable of length nor breadth no matter how many are strung along.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 066B2E45-D79A-4F83-B666-65DA9B8E (...).jpg, 71KiB, 750x1000

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 06:12:07 No.11550368 Report

Quoted By:

>>11550261
tldr

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 06:15:27 No.11550372 Report

Quoted By:

>speed of light
Just multiply it by two lmao

btfo

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 06:18:27 No.11550383 Report

Quoted By:

>>11549213
btfo whom? nobody that knows anything is claiming that the planck length is the smallest possible length. that's totally nonsensical. for something to have the property of "length", it must be taking up an area to be divisible by.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 10 Apr 2020 13:13:56 No.11550996 Report

Quoted By:

>>11550261
I agree with th... Oh fug

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches