>>11538350If Mochizuki is in some way ever proven right, we will spend the rest of our lives praising IUT.
Currently, he seems unable to defend or clarify his theory; or present his work in an even slightly different form.
I do not understand anything beyond the basic structure of the discussions surrounding IUT, and I imagine there are few if any anons with significantly greater understanding. All I can say is I enjoy the "event" of all this, Mochizuki and RIMS saying "fuck it," and Scholze BTFOing cultists in the comments section of a Columbia professor's blog.
Maybe we should all copy and paste our Mochizuki comments in each thread that is up.