>>11534506How could this possibly be true?
The act of measuring is a relay chain, so even if one tried to count for the entire of everything they still would not be able to count themselves because you can't hand the relay back to yourself.
Only by passing the process of measuring on can the previous measurer be included in a set.
Do it enough times and you have a language/axiom/schema, which are just other ways of saying 'ways to escape the curse of dimensionality' or self-referentialism THE GAME.
>Helping OP is key to the game of patience. 
