>>11528964Trying to spin the USA-ian nonsense this hard.
Just admit that its nonsense and move on.
>We're fine with the traditional definition.Produce the algorithm to determine this and lets see the results of it.
The USA-an 7 continent shit makes no sense whatsoever.
>travelling by foot from north africa to central africa and from east africa to west africaWEW. Like pointed out this is trivial since historically no one knew of Australia and America. There was a difference between going to Britain and going to America.
>travelling by foot from north africa to central africaAnd yet all of history disproves you people of Euto-afro-asia did travel on their world island and established trade routs. Someone from the Europ region did know about china in the Asian region and communication and trade was possible however time consuming and difficult.
>World" is a poetic term not meant to be taken literallyThe word world is extremely specific however never properly used by most people. World literally describes the available space to a civilization.
Meaning this planet is our world because traveling beyond it is extra hard. And if we manage to establish colonies on Mars our world expands in size (see definition) and Mars becomes a part of our world.
in contrast if there is a civilization somewhere in space its a separate world from ours since we have no contact with them. If we establish contact and have the means to travel these 2 separate worlds will merge into one world.
Do separate Petri dishes also trigger you anon? Basically the same with the concept of the world/worlds.
