No.11527955 ViewReplyOriginalReport
>but it's non-ionizing radiation

Adverse health effects of 5G mobile networking technology under real-life conditions
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31991167
>Identifies wide-spectrum of adverse health effects of non-ionizing non-visible radiation
>• Most laboratory experiments were not designed to identify the more severe adverse effects reflective of real-life conditions
>• Many experiments do not include the real-life pulsing and modulation of the carrier signal
>• Vast majority of experiments do not account for synergistic adverse effects of other toxic stimuli with wireless radiation
>• 5G mobile networking technology will affect not only the skin and eyes, but will have adverse systemic effects as well
>This article identifies adverse effects of non-ionizing non-visible radiation (hereafter called wireless radiation) reported in the premier biomedical literature.

Appeals that matter or not on a moratorium on the deployment of the fifth generation, 5G, for microwave radiation
>https://www.spandidos-publications.com/10.3892/mco.2020.1984/download
>Radiofrequency (RF) radiation in the frequency range of 30 kHz?300 GHz is classified as a ‘possible’ human carcinogen, Group 2B, by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) since 2011. The evidence has since then been strengthened by further research; thus, RF radiation may now be classified as a human carcinogen

Spatial and Time Averaging Restrictions Within the Electromagnetic Exposure Safety Framework in the Frequency Range Above 6GHz
>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31885092
>In this study, we show that the application of the current and proposed limits for pulsed fields can lead to a temperature increase of 10°C for short pulses and frequencies between 6 and 30GHz.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLVIbPtNrVo

WAKE UP