There is no better way to demonstrate that you are an egotistical pseudo-intellectual hack than to use the terms 'infinitely many', 'demonstrably so', and 'QED'.
>infinitely many
We have a word for that. It's 'infinity'. Anyone that says 'infinitely many' instead of 'infinity' is a pseudo-intellectual retard.
>demonstrably so
There isn't necessarily anything inherently wrong with this phrase, but whenever I encounter someone using it in practice, they're using it with the exclusive intent of inflating their ego. I would instead say something like 'provably so', not because it is inherently better, but because the egotistical pseudointellectuals have ruined the phrase 'demonstrably so' by using it for ego inflationary purposes instead of legitimate purposes.
>QED
Valid when used to refer to quantum electrodynamics. When used to refer to having demonstrated or proven something, it's retarded as fuck and again used as an ego inflater, not as something of actual value or meaning.
>infinitely many
We have a word for that. It's 'infinity'. Anyone that says 'infinitely many' instead of 'infinity' is a pseudo-intellectual retard.
>demonstrably so
There isn't necessarily anything inherently wrong with this phrase, but whenever I encounter someone using it in practice, they're using it with the exclusive intent of inflating their ego. I would instead say something like 'provably so', not because it is inherently better, but because the egotistical pseudointellectuals have ruined the phrase 'demonstrably so' by using it for ego inflationary purposes instead of legitimate purposes.
>QED
Valid when used to refer to quantum electrodynamics. When used to refer to having demonstrated or proven something, it's retarded as fuck and again used as an ego inflater, not as something of actual value or meaning.
