>>11525781If you go with the traditional definition of free will, our choices could be said to be free if they are not determined by the prior state of the universe so quantum randomness affecting our choices would give us free will. Now, the traditional definition of free will is retarded, and you rightly reject this definition when people use quantum indeterminism to justify the claim that we have free will. But because you're a faggot who wants to define free will out of existence, no matter how the world turns out to be, you also hypocritically appeal to this retarded definition to say that we don't have free will, even though we can get from the causal and deterministic aspects of our universe all of the senses our wills can be free that actually matter or mean anything.
