>>11510252>Sure, men have a significant natural advantage at assault, obviously that will account for a higher rate of men committing assault, but anyone can kill with a gun.Well no you missed the point of what I was saying. I wasn't talking about only violent crime, I was talking about crime in general. Even if I was talking about assault, women are much more likely to start hitting someone, however when a man hits someone he's much more likely to hurt them and therefore be punished for it. I was saying crime in general is just an example of what happens when men fail to control their emotions. There are other examples of what happens when women fail to control their emotions (which does include assault) such as their analysis of what is true in the world, what career should go in etc. The way you're making your argumnet implies that the only way to gauge EI is to simply look at crime rates which is flawed.
>then why is it that women commit vastly less crime?Because women have less testosterone.
>Every time a cop misinterprets something as aggression and kills an unarmed person that's a failure of emotional intelligence.Yeah... I still fail to see how this is anywhere near as important as the intelligence that IQ tests. I never implied that it was useless.
