>Evidence supporting this anon's assertions:
It's now common knowledge that there are at least two strains of COVID-19, S and L.
China seems to have vanquished the disease from the Wuhan area while other countries are struggling to do so.
The PRC has a track record of shirking responsibility regarding matters that affect the international community.
>Evidence contradicting this anon's assertions:
The prevalence of the supposedly non-lethal S-strain in Europe is as high as 30%. 30% of tested cases are S and 70% are L. How can a strain with an R0 of less than 0.5 have a 30/70 ratio with a strain that has a much higher R0?
Conflicting reports of whether or not one is more lethal than the other.
The guy posted it on /pol/.
It's now common knowledge that there are at least two strains of COVID-19, S and L.
China seems to have vanquished the disease from the Wuhan area while other countries are struggling to do so.
The PRC has a track record of shirking responsibility regarding matters that affect the international community.
>Evidence contradicting this anon's assertions:
The prevalence of the supposedly non-lethal S-strain in Europe is as high as 30%. 30% of tested cases are S and 70% are L. How can a strain with an R0 of less than 0.5 have a 30/70 ratio with a strain that has a much higher R0?
Conflicting reports of whether or not one is more lethal than the other.
The guy posted it on /pol/.
