>>11505805Wheel theory? Is that like.. actual fucking wheels that spin and shit, or is this another "ring-theory" thing where the name is misleading?
>>11505811>Aren't they useless garbage? A curiosity for kindergarten kids.I've said this kind of thing at different times in my math career yet I was almost always making hasty remarks about the significance of those subjects. This considered, I will stake a coin toss to decide wheel theory is the real deal.
>>11505941>Well, it sounds like someone knows less about wheel theory than wheel theory knows about him! Here's a little tip, kid: you can never hope to defeat your enemies without knowing how they think. And by the time you know enough wheel theory to fight the wheel theoretic, it's already too late. You're already a wheel theorist.So many fucking red flags. I'm raising the stakes, now it's like 1/10 chance that Wheel theory is fucking awesome, 9/10 it's a meme. Fuck it, I'm going in.
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheel_theory>http://www.cs.swan.ac.uk/~csetzer/articles/wheel.pdf>http://www2.math.su.se/reports/2001/11/2001-11.pdfBravo, Anon. That was stupider than I thought it was going to be.
