>>11496999You dense fucker. I'm saying that he's being influenced by his cultural-religious background and possibly by his understanding of politics (particularly the role of Einstein as an ambassador for the Jewish people) in his science, or is likely to have been.
If I was to note that Darwin and Wallace came up with their theories with an intellectual and lived background in economic liberalism, and that this probably influenced their work (it did, particularly via Adam Smith's intellectual influence on Thomas Malthus [both Darwin and Wallace cited Malthus as the biggest influence on their theories]), or that Russian socialism might have influenced Lyshenko, including via Kropotkin's anarcho-socialist spin on evolution (as seen in his 1905 work Mutual Aid: A Factor of Evolution), that would be obvious.
Yet when I say there might be a Jewish mystical and/or political influence on a Jewish man who said "I like to say that in my life, apart from the family there are three passions - physics, tennis, and Israel.", that's somehow crazy or purely the realm of /x/, in some derogatory sense?
No, fuck you.
I'm actually kind of doubtful you're confused by this. It's so obvious that you have to be willfully misrepresenting what I'm writing. Either that or you're an idiot.
In either case, neck yourself, cunt.
