>>11497292>low calorie density foodOur stomach capacity isn't normally the limit.
>Fruit was much smaller before agriculture,False. Fruit used to be much higher quality nutrition wise. Supermarkets demand fruit that is sturdy so that it survives transport and handling unblemished, and looks nice, not one that is sweet and tastes good.
>and relatively rare.Trees produce fruit in prodigious amounts. A regular sized tree produces so much fruit it's too much for one family.
> damn nutsMore calories dense than fruit and vegetables.
>tubersLike potatoes?
>I account leanness to the scarcity of calorie dense food.Why shoud this density matter? It seems extraordinarily unlikely people would be incapable of consuming enough food. Our stomachs are big enough and digestion can speed up as needed.
>Domesticated pigs? They aren't choosing their food. You can credit that achievement to their keepers.They are basically fed as much they are capable of consuming to make them grow as fast as possible. They are basically given as much as they can eat without spoiling, twice a day as much as they can eat in half an hour or something similar.
>Possibly lack of exercise and shitty diet, just like us.They eat grass. Grass, is grass. You may give them grains, but it isn't like you have too many choices. It's a horse.
> Do wild horses get fat?I don't think there are any anymore. (except Przewalskis or how you spell it, but those are not truly wild)
