>>11490923Why would anyone still say it's natural? What agenda does such a person serve?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797993/> "Pseudotyping experiments were based on HIV-based pseudovirus"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797993/pdf/nihms766724.pdfhttps://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985Nature full PDF:
https://files.catbox.moe/bbamzm.pdf> "gain-of-function"> "We built a chimeric virus encoding a novel, zoonotic CoV spike protein from the RsSHC014-CoV sequence that was isolated from Chinese horseshoe bats in the context of the SARS-CoV mouse-adapted backbone. We characterized CoV infection mediated by the SHC014 spike protein in primary human airway cells and in vivo."> Xing-Yi Ge> Zhengli-Li Shi> + funding from China:> "National Natural Science Foundation of China awards 81290341 (Z.-L.S.) and 31470260 (X.-Y.G.).""Lab-Made Coronavirus Triggers Debate":
https://archive.is/Ei4j8> “The only impact of this work is the creation, in a lab, of a new, non-natural risk,” Richard Ebright, a molecular biologist and biodefence expert at Rutgers University, told Nature. 
