>>11477779>Selection for intelligence is not anomalous.>Weak selection for strength is not anomalous.It is, when you combine those low probabilities together, which actually decreases the probability by a considerable amount. Combining that with the very low probability of ape-like creatures developing inconsistent hair growth patterns, means an even sharper decrease in probability.
>Selection for reduced hair growth is not anomalous.I said 'hair-growth patterns', not simply 'reduced hair growth'. As in, I can grow long hair on my chin and scalp, given enough time, and yet my shoulders are bald and my testicles aren't.
Also, it is anomalous, if you're grouping humans with ape-like creatures under the umbrella/claim that we all came from an ape-ancestor, for humans would be the only ones to have these irrefutable differences from ape-like creatures and all ape-like creatures share the same hair coverage.
Combine all of this with the fact that humans are the only ones capable of imperialism, arts, philosophy and science, and you have an astronomically extreme low probability of ape-like creatures ever evolving to become humans.
Again, Ape-Ancestor-to-Human evolution is an unproven hypothesis. Therefore, it is not an objective fact.
>Ooo, I love ancient aliens bullshit, but you’re gonna have to prove that’s what occurred. We all know you can’t, so I suppose this is where you stop posting.It is as I said before, to claim to objectively know the full story of our species is objectively false. No hypothesis, scientific or religious, has been proven.
