>>11473534>>11473565here you go. Tall narrow hips bunch the meat up, wide hips spread it out--when viewed from profile, the former has a bigger and "African" style butt. They also give an illusion of curviness even when the waist is big/equal.
Africans tall hips, North Asians shortest. Europeans closer to Asians--the tall hips they do have come from Basal Eurasian (African) ancestry spread by the Anatolians and Aryans. Real Europeans were more Asian looking morphologically--average white is only 60% European. It's why girls from Russia/Baltic look so much more feminine than Anglos or other westerners (they're closer to 80% European). The rest of the DNA is Middle Eastern from the Anat/Ary groups.
In addition, C-sections = artificial dysgenic selection. They select narrow-hipped women who otherwise couldn't birth a child--these narrow hipped women also have smaller brains. C section also allows large-brain men to reproduce with narrow-hip women, which is not naturally possible.
This is why everyone is obsessed with ass, "thiccness", high waisted pants, etc., while in the 90s or 2000s everything was low cut and slim figures were in. Civilization, C sections, guaranteed survival, select for primitive phenotypes among women.
