>>11464696This isn't uncommon on Wikipedia: Some page or content on that page is there because one guy is really into it, or wants to shill his work, and writes "Wikipedia" article which is mostly just their own content.
E.g. consider how this fringe topic article is writte
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_Schr%C3%B6dinger_equationYou even find it, for example, Voevodsky after his infamous quarrel with the computer scientists in the Homotopy Type community, that he (as a homotopy theorists etc.) guided for long enough.
Despite there being a homotopy type theory page on Wikipedia, he wrote
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Univalent_foundationsand thus is has non-common style sentences such as
>The main ideas of univalent foundations were formulated by Vladimir Voevodsky during the years 2006 to 2009. The sole reference for the philosophical connections between univalent foundations and earlier ideas are Voevodsky's 2014 Bernays lectures.[2] The name "univalence" is due to Voevodsky.[3] A more detailed discussion of the history of some of the ideas that contribute to the current state of univalent foundations can be found at the page on homotopy type theory.He's dead now but you can look at his edits knowing /wiki/User:Vladimirias
For some autistic pages (for better or worse) consider
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_lists_of_listsTo leave this on a positive note, I like to point people to this users page
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:LucasVB/Gallery 
