>>11454490you are an extension of natural law, consiousness is an emergent property stacked on many other emergent properties that arise from natural laws
do not take a reductionist approach beyond natural law
do not assume your existence to have any meaning different to a rock or fictional idea
have a refined anthropomorphic principle in your pocket so you dont think yourself too self important, understand that you, the ego, are an emergent property of a discernment process
realize that you rely on a constantly changing state to exist, we are order in a decaying process, and that this process spreads out locally in a wave pattern from any arbitrary point in "space"
you are free to give yourself any reason you desire, and consider how cool that is in the leu of the alternatives
"god" is natural law, often described using math conciousness exists within this natural law, as we see it, but there is no reason to assume it to be collective or all spreading, think for yourself on why "god" can never be "all powerful"
we are the closest thing to our description of god. is it more arrogant to hold on to this preception, or let it go? you have the choice to decide that, and thats pretty cool
