>>11453383All logical fallacies are de-facto traps induced on you by some psychologist from old Greece...
We do not have a rhetoric fight in which one side wins and other does not, but we're trying to find a solution we will have in common after discussion.
Not a rhetoric "mudfight" or rhetoric wrestling.
Rhteroic is awful...
It's like this:
"I will shoot you!"
"I'm ignoring fact that you're and armed gangster, because that woul'd be argument ad hominem, and kindly refuse to be shot"
You will wonder, it sometimes works, but... It's bullshit.
Anyway life is not rhetoric fight, so you should not act like it's one. We are trying to reach some GLOBAL knowledge sometimes or how to say to you, that everybody can't have it's own opinion, because information is certainly limited, that much it drives some people into watching TV Series, just to predict something nobody else did on something that's not even really happening.
"You cannot shot me or not, you must partly shot me, because there's no black and white"
"Even last time I haven't been shot when I didn't payd my debt to mafia, so chance is the same, isn't it?"
"Many people don't eat their fecalia, I shouldn't jump on band wagon"
Dude, trust me, it will immunitize you and I have no name so you cannot commit argument ad hominem!
Also
You're comitting strawman and fallacy fallacy.
We're trying to achieve state that NOBODY WILL FUCKING TRY MORALITY AND FULLY BLOWN AI UNTIL SOME THINGS ARE SETTLED, BECAUSE THEN YOU'LL PRAY FOR NUCLEAR WAR TO HAPPEN TO END YOUR SUFFERING.
Just accept it as being that can have faults, and even humans aren't strictly moral, even the best ones, because nobody is presented whole situation, maybe even ever. Sorry god, even you failed sometimes.
