>>11451450If Bigfoot exist, it’s not possible for them to resemble the figure seen in the Patterson-Gimlin film.
The problem is that bipedalism either an in-line evolved once in primates, namely the Australopithecine apes. Similarly, a human-shapes nose evolved once in primates, namely the genus Homo. When you add evolutionary coincidences, you multiply the improbability.
Let’s discuss the most prominent physical evidence, the footprints. The vast majority of all Sasquatch footprints do not look like human feet: there is no arch, here is a sort of double ball behind the big toe, and there is a mid-tarsal break.a mid-tarsal break is present in non-Homo great apes. Since a mid-tarsal break is present in all non-Homo great apes, that would mean they delineated prior to the genus Homo, and this absolutely cannot possess a human-like hooded nose.
